Karen Read Retrial Verdict: Acquitted of Murder, Convicted of Drunken Driving
In a dramatic conclusion to a highly publicized case, a Norfolk County jury delivered its verdict in the retrial of Karen Read, a 45-year-old Massachusetts woman accused of killing her Boston police officer boy
friend, John O’Keefe, in January 2022. After a hung jury in her first trial, Read faced charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence, and leaving the scene of a crash. On June 18, 2025, the jury found her not guilty of second-degree murder
and other felony charges but guilty of operating under the influence (OUI), resulting in a one-year probation sentence. This gripping case, marked by allegations of a police cover-up and intense public scrutiny, has sparked widespread discussion about justice and accountability.
Key Highlights of the Karen Read Verdict
Acquittal on Major Charges: Read was cleared of second-degree murder and manslaughter, a significant win for the defense, which argued O’Keefe’s death resulted from a fight inside a home, not a vehicular collision.
OUI Conviction: The jury convicted Read of drunken driving, citing evidence of her intoxication on the night of O’Keefe’s death during a blizzard. She was sentenced to one year of probation.
Public Reaction: Supporters, many wearing pink and waving American flags, erupted in cheers outside the Dedham courthouse, chanting “Karen Read is free!”
Defense Strategy Triumphs: Attorney Alan Jackson’s claims of investigative bias and lack of evidence for a vehicular collision swayed the jury, highlighting reasonable doubt.
Trial Challenges: The jury deliberated for over 22 hours, navigating confusion over verdict slips and even briefly retracting an initial verdict announcement.
The Case That Captivated a Nation
The Karen Read case gripped the public with its mix of tragedy, conspiracy allegations, and courtroom drama. Prosecutors alleged Read, intoxicated and angry, struck O’Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in a snowbank. The defense countered with claims of a cover-up, asserting O’Keefe was beaten inside a Canton home, possibly bitten by a dog, and left outside. This narrative, combined with the firing of lead investigator Michael Proctor for misconduct, fueled public skepticism about the investigation’s integrity.
The retrial, spanning over 30 days of testimony and four days of deliberation, was a media spectacle. Posts on X reflected the polarized sentiment, with users like
@MicheleMcPhee
noting the crowd’s eruption at the not guilty verdict and
@AmberWoods100
breaking the news of the OUI conviction. The case’s twists, including a bizarre moment when the jury briefly retracted its verdict announcement, kept audiences on edge.
**Shareable Quote**
“This case wasn’t just about a verdict; it was about exposing flaws in the system and fighting for truth.” – Defense Attorney Alan Jackson
Why This Matters
The Karen Read verdict underscores critical issues in the justice system, from allegations of police misconduct to the power of public advocacy. The case’s high-profile nature, amplified by supporters’ vocal presence and social media buzz, highlights the role of community in shaping legal outcomes. For those interested in true crime, criminal justice reform, or Massachusetts legal news, this story offers a compelling narrative of resilience and reasonable doubt.
Learn About Criminal Justice Reform: Visit The Innocence Project for insights into preventing wrongful convictions.
Stay Updated on True Crime : Follow Court TV for live trial coverage and expert analysis.
Join the Conversation: Check out trending discussions on X about the Karen Read case for real-time perspectives.
Influencer Touch
True crime influencer
@BrianEntin
, wiath a massive following, shared live updates on the verdict, emphasizing its significance in the true crime community. His post, “Karen Read Verdict: Not Guilty on Murder, Guilty on OUI,” garnered thousands of engagements, reflecting the case’s broad impact.
This verdict closes a chapter in a polarizing saga, but its ripples will continue to spark debate about justice, evidence, and trust in law enforcement. Share this story to join the conversation and explore the complexities of the Karen Read case.
Comments