Shakira wins big after many setbacks during world tour

Shakira wins big after many setbacks during world tour Shakira has been crowned Billboard's Global Touring Icon for her record-breaking Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran tour, which has grossed an impressive $327.4 million and sold over 2.5 million tickets. The tour,...

from The News International - Entertainment https://ift.tt/RfnThlq

Tom Cruise in good spirits following breakup with Ana de Armas

Top Gun actor looked composed and relaxed despite the recent breakup with Ana de ArmasTom Cruise was spotted out alone in London on Wednesday, marking his first public appearance since the end of nine-month relationship with actress Ana de Armas.The 63-year-old Hollywood star appeared in his...

from The News International - Entertainment https://ift.tt/l38OCIY

Justice Gorsuch's 'one-way ratchet' warning echoes through the halls: Will SCOTUS rein in Trump's tariff empire? Neal Katyal leads the charge. #IEEPA #SupremeCourtTariffs

Supreme Court Grills Trump on Tariff Powers: Neal Katyal's Bold Stand Against IEEPA Overreach

In a high-stakes clash at the U.S. Supreme Court, former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal delivered a powerhouse argument challenging President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to slap sweeping tariffs on imports. Facing off against current Solicitor General D. John Sauer, the November 5, 2025, oral arguments exposed deep divisions on executive authority, with even Trump-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch raising alarms about unchecked presidential power. This case isn't just about trade—it's a constitutional battle over who controls America's wallet: Congress or the White House? As small businesses reeling from higher costs push back, the justices' tough questions signal potential trouble for Trump's economic playbook. Could this ruling curb "emergency" tariffs forever? Dive into the drama, key quotes, and what it means for global trade.

Why This Matters: Tariffs as Taxes in DisguiseTrump's tariffs, invoked under IEEPA to tackle trade deficits, fentanyl flows, and national security threats, have funneled billions into federal coffers—incidental revenue, Sauer insisted, not a revenue grab. But Katyal fired back with a mic-drop opener: "Tariffs are taxes." He argued that these duties, which hit American importers and consumers hardest (with 30-80% of costs passed on domestically), encroach on Congress's exclusive power under Article I to levy taxes and duties.

Justice Gorsuch, no stranger to reining in executive overreach, warned of a "one-way ratchet" tilting power from elected lawmakers to the Oval Office. Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett piled on, questioning why no prior president wielded IEEPA this way and mocking tariffs on allies like Spain or France as absurd. The bench seemed "deeply skeptical," per observers, potentially striking down broad tariff authority and forcing Trump to seek congressional buy-in for future trade wars. The Katyal-Sauer Showdown: Key Moments from the Transcript

• Sauer’s Defense: He stressed tariffs as "regulatory" tools for emergencies, not taxes, citing Nixon's 1971 global surcharge as precedent. But when pressed on revenue, he conceded Americans foot much of the bill.
• Katyal’s Counterpunch: Representing four small firms, he hammered "common sense": IEEPA lets presidents block imports (embargoes) but not tax them. Imposing a 1% tariff? That's congressional turf.
• Gorsuch's Zinger: "Are tariffs always foreign affairs?" Sauer's pause spoke volumes, highlighting the blurry line between trade policy and domestic taxation.

For the full fireworks, check the official transcript. Shareable Quote: Fuel the Debate

"Tariffs are taxes—and Congress holds the purse strings. This isn't about emergencies; it's about evading the Constitution."
— Neal Katyal, Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Nov. 5, 2025 #TariffsAreTaxes an power!

What Happens Next? Impacts on Economy and PolicyA win for challengers could refund billions to businesses, ease inflation pressures, and clip Trump's wings on unilateral trade moves. Pro-tariff voices, like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, remain bullish, claiming the Court leaned presidential. But analysts see a conservative majority wobbling, prioritizing separation of powers over policy wins. For deeper dives:

• SCOTUSblog's Live Analysis – Expert breakdowns of bench vibes.
• PBS NewsHour Coverage – Balanced reporting on small biz stakes.
• NPR's Play-by-Play – Audio clips of the grilling.
• Politico's Takeaways – Insider scoops on Sauer’s slip-ups.

Influencer Buzz: X Threads Lighting Up the TimelineThe legal eagles and pundits are all over this. Embed these threads on your post for viral juice (use X's embed tool):

1. Neal Katyal's Post-Hearing Reflection (
   @neal_katyal
   ): A heartfelt nod to constitutional roots amid the fray. Thread Embed – 8K+ likes, perfect for inspirational shares.
2. Acyn's Viral Clips (
   @Acyn
   ): Side-splitting montages of justices tag-teaming Sauer. Thread Embed – 200K+ views, meme gold.
3. Aaron Rupar's Highlights (
   @atrupar
   ): Sharp breakdowns of Bessent's overconfidence vs. Katyal's facts. Thread Embed – 186K views, policy wonk heaven.
4. Fox News' Conservative Spin (
   @FoxNews
   ): Barrett and Sotomayor's "interrogation" framed as tough love. Thread Embed – Balanced for cross-aisle appeal. !

#IEEPA #SupremeCourtTariffs": neal katyal, tariffs supreme court, ieepa tariffs, neil gorsuch tariffs
: john sauer solicitor general, katyal vs sauer supreme court, trump ieepa overreach 2025, are tariffs taxes constitution
: supreme court justices tariffs, solicitor general arguments, ieepa emergency powers, trump trade war legal challenge